Conference on Public Participation in Scientific Research, Day 1 Session 1 – 8/4/2012
PPSR: How We Got Here and Where We Go Now
Exciting to bring wide range of disciplines together and develop a more global perspective. Take-aways: PPSR is not new, has always been important to science, and is growing and innovating very quickly.
Models for PPSR – taxonomy of projects by degree of involvement of participants, contributory, collaborative, and co-created.
How we got here: Science began as amateur research with Plato and Aristotle, often by rich people who had money and time. Some of the most important science has relied on public participation, e.g. Linneas. Professionalization of science has marginalized public participation and that’s where we are today.
Nonetheless, PPSR has continued, just not always labeled as such or recognized as broadly as it should be. Originally it was often specimens, but now it’s usually observational data. It’s also used to solve local problems, and that’s an important role. Big data sets are also being generated through citizen science, some of these are the most important for their field, for example NOAA’s weather data that is being used to understand climate change.
Recent developments: huge improvements in tech, communication, data storage, analysis & best practices, this kind of revolution is not without precedent. Another big advance is with explicit participant-focused outcomes, which is still fairly new.
We need data over wide time periods and geographic ranges to achieve many of our scientific goals moving forward. Things like fine-scale weather observations through CoCoRaHS which is really important for decision-making; looking at changes in phenology to understand climate change and losses in biodiversity, e.g. findings from looking at Thoreau’s data through time with current citizen science data.
Many applications: images and sound analysis; real-time data for near-term predications; collection and transcription of historical records; health and environmental justice.
Huge growth in PPSR recently, e.g. with ISI on peer-reviewed publications – exponential growth in last 6 years. More to come as cross-disciplinary dialogue, collaboration & innovation develop. Now we see a need to formalize and support the field and practitioners. Still getting push-back at NPS for making management decisions based on PPSR data.
Where do you want PPSR to go? What does the field need? What do you need in your role in PPSR? What should an organization for PPSR do? Poster session opportunities to post your responses to important questions. Will be using this feedback in closing session discussion – please participate and help us act on these recommendations from the community.
Q: Issues – recognition of citizen science and use of the language in publications – what is this doing to help legitimize PPSR.
Grand Challenges and Big Data: Implications for PPSR
Challenges we face, scientifically and technologically, focusing on data issues as that’s where the rubber hits the road from a science perspective. Many issues we are concerned about, primarily related to climate change, clean energy, and so on. We’re in a new age where we’re hitting some tipping points and likely to see very abrupt changes that will have significant impact on future and quality of life on earth.
Many tools being used for data-intensive science, but data management is one of the challenges standing in the way of results – we need to speed up time to results and reduce time on mundane tasks like data management. Another key challenge is expanding participation.
Major concern – where are the data? We need to be able to integrate data to address major scientific challenges. This leads to the long-tail distribution of data problem with many data orphans. Jim Gray – “Most of the bytes are at the high end, but most of the datasets are at the low end.” Brings up an important question – we’re all familiar with the research life cycle, but how do we link it to the data life cycle?
Solutions: DataONE is addressing some key issues, e.g. data preservation. Intro to http://www.dataone.org.
One of the main science data management/analysis tools currently in use is Excel [shifting toward Google Docs]. D1 is developing tools for R, which is one of the second-most popular tools for analysis, working with many partners.
Issue 2: Data discovery – not easily found with traditional search tools. Major project of D1 has been ONEMercury for searching across datasets.
Issue 3: Tools for innovation and discovery. We’re in the 4th paradigm of research, focus on data-intensive research that requires new tools, techniques, and ways of doing research. Another way the investigator toolkit fits in to address this question. Examples include DMPTool, data management planning tool – helps get grants funded for agencies requiring data management plans, but should be a consideration for PPSR projects. Supports 12+ templates required by different agencies with walk-through series of steps to address required points for data management plans. At the most, all you need to do with this after going through wizard is change font.
Upcoming tool: DataUp to check Excel spreadsheets for best practices, create metadata and connect to ONEShare, one of the D1 repositories – all for free.
Finally, need for tools for exploration, visualization, and analysis. Example needed data layers from several sources to address research question, one only found through word of mouth, had to develop new modeling tools and work with new tool (VisTrails) to develop visualization.
People and Participation: Educational and Community Components of PPSR Projects
Came to PPSR as HS teacher, then worked in community-based forest management, and then working with science education at UC Davis.
Need to look at PPSR across different practices. Many disciplines and goals represented here: biochem, ecology, astronomy, nat rsc mgt, and public health. Also have: psych, sci & enviro ed, social justice & community development, sociology, anthropology.
Names for PPSR categories are called different names by other scholars, this is explored in recent Ecology & Society article. Need to think about more than degree of participation and what part of scientific process. Other important aspects related to quality – Whose interests are being served, and to what end? Who makes decisions? Who has the power?
This leads into discussions of democratizing science – role of PPSR is improved science understanding for everyone, which results in better research. Examples include LiMPETS monitoring 600 miles of CA’s National Marine Sanctuaries, students taking it very seriously because it will be used for science. Additional examples related to rice growing and health impacts.
Looking at social and educational outcomes of PPSR – individual, programmatic, & community level. Often PPSR focuses on programmatic level – audience reach, engagement, program strengths/weaknesses, etc. Current work focusing on individual learning outcomes, and community-level outcomes are exciting area to develop – social capital, community capacity, economic impacts, trust between public, scientists & managers.
Her main question is: if we think about intertwining of social & ecological systems, many stakeholders involved, can we improve their resilience?